Faster, safer, and easier to manage — let’s rebuild your site the right way.
Framer is an impressive platform. It’s sleek, fast to prototype in, and offers a modern visual approach to building websites—especially for design-focused users. But while it’s excellent for launching beautiful one-pagers or marketing sites quickly, many teams and individuals eventually hit its limitations when projects grow more complex.
Migrating from Framer to Webflow isn’t about switching tools for the sake of it — it’s a strategic move. Webflow offers greater control, a more powerful CMS, better SEO capabilities, and a robust framework for scaling both the site and the business it supports.
Let’s break down the core reasons why a migration makes sense.
Framer prioritizes speed and simplicity. But this can come at a cost:
If your goal is to build something that lasts — not just launch quickly — Webflow is a better long-term solution.
Webflow’s code output is cleaner, more predictable, and more SEO-friendly. You can fine-tune everything from <meta>
tags to schema markup to custom page structures, without needing to use plugins or workarounds.
Framer is fantastic for fast, beautiful MVPs. But once performance, structure, or content complexity becomes a factor, Webflow is the better tool for the job. It’s not a step back — it’s a step forward in control, scalability, and performance.
Migrating from Framer to Webflow isn't a direct copy-paste process. While your final site may look visually identical (or even improved), the migration involves rebuilding the structure, styling, and content logic from the ground up using Webflow’s tools and conventions.
This section explains what you can expect during and after the process—so there are no surprises, only clarity.
If your Framer site is well-designed, the goal is to preserve that design in Webflow as closely as possible. However, because Framer and Webflow handle layout, animation, and responsiveness differently, a rebuild is required—not a simple export.
Expect the design to match with high accuracy, but built using Webflow-native structure, interactions, and styles.
Content such as blog posts, team bios, product listings, or CMS-driven sections will be restructured using Webflow CMS. The migration includes importing the content, creating appropriate collections, and configuring relationships (e.g., categories, tags, authors) so the site is manageable and scalable.
You’ll end up with a CMS that’s not only familiar, but more powerful than what Framer offered.
Webflow provides more granular control over SEO tags, open graph settings, URL slugs, 301 redirects, and custom code. These features will be configured or migrated during the process.
After the migration, you’ll be able to:
If your Framer site includes animations or transitions, they’ll be recreated in Webflow using Webflow Interactions. Some may be simplified depending on browser support or performance, but the behavior and feel will be retained where it counts.
One of the key outcomes of this migration is long-term maintainability. Webflow’s class-based system, components, and CMS give you or your team the ability to manage content, update pages, and evolve the site without needing a developer every time.
A smooth migration starts with proper preparation. Before jumping into development, a short but focused planning phase helps ensure that no critical detail is missed and that the final result is scalable, maintainable, and faithful to your original goals.
Whether your site is simple or complex, taking time to prepare will reduce friction during the migration and lead to better results.
The first step is to go through your current Framer site and identify what needs to be migrated, rebuilt, or improved. Key elements to check:
Documenting this upfront ensures nothing is left behind or re-invented mid-process.
Migration is a good time to re-evaluate parts of your site that could be improved or removed. Ask yourself:
This is your opportunity to not just replicate the site, but improve it.
For the rebuild, you'll need to collect and organize all design and content assets:
Providing this early accelerates the build process and avoids unnecessary back-and-forth.
Clarify any changes in goal for the new build. Are you aiming for:
Knowing the "why" behind the migration helps guide decisions during development, from CMS structure to component architecture.
Once preparation is complete, development begins with a clear roadmap—reducing surprises, revisions, and delays.
Migrating from Framer to Webflow is not a one-click action. It’s a structured rebuild—translating visuals, interactions, content structure, and site functionality into a new system. Below is the full process broken into distinct phases, each one aimed at ensuring design consistency, content integrity, and long-term maintainability.
Start by breaking down your Framer project into its core design elements:
This is the blueprint phase—defining exactly what needs to be recreated or improved inside Webflow.
Once analysis is complete, a new Webflow project is initialized with:
This ensures consistency and scalability across the entire project.
Each page is rebuilt using semantic HTML structure and Webflow-native elements:
If the Framer site uses component variants or interactive elements, these are translated into Webflow Interactions or replaced with native components and custom code when necessary.
Dynamic content is rebuilt in Webflow CMS:
Collection Lists
The result is a clean, scalable CMS that empowers non-technical users to update the site without risking layout issues.
Framer's built-in animations are often re-created using:
Where necessary, animations are optimized for performance and mobile usability, balancing visual polish with load speed.
As each page is built, SEO fundamentals are configured:
If applicable, 301 redirects from the Framer domain are set up to preserve rankings.
Before launch, the entire site goes through:
Once approved, the site is launched:
Post-launch, a short period of support may be included to fix unforeseen issues or extend features.
When migrating from Framer to Webflow, one of the most important priorities is preserving the visual identity of the original site. However, Framer and Webflow use different layout models, styling logic, and animation frameworks—so the goal is not to mimic Framer exactly, but to translate the design into Webflow’s more structured, maintainable environment.
Done right, the result is a pixel-perfect site that not only looks great but is easier to manage and scale.
Framer relies on freeform, frame-based layouting, similar to Figma. This can feel intuitive for designers, but often leads to rigid or fragile responsive behavior.
In Webflow:
section > container > content block
)The end result is a layout that’s more consistent, scalable, and responsive on all devices.
In Framer, typography and spacing are often styled directly or reused across frames.
In Webflow:
You end up with a design system that’s easy to maintain and update globally, without manually adjusting individual elements.
Framer allows highly detailed animations using a Figma-like timeline and properties. Some of those can be recreated exactly in Webflow—others need simplification.
Webflow’s interactions engine handles:
In complex cases (e.g., chained animations, conditional behaviors), custom JavaScript is used to recreate Framer functionality without sacrificing performance.
Framer doesn’t enforce a class-based structure—each element can have inline styles or variants. Webflow benefits from being more structured.
During the rebuild:
The result is not just a site that looks the same—it’s one that’s far more maintainable and extendable.
Framer offers a simplified CMS system that works well for basic sites, but when your content becomes more structured or dynamic, limitations start to surface. One of the most valuable advantages of migrating to Webflow is the flexibility and power of its native CMS.
A proper migration involves not just moving content over, but rethinking how that content is organized, managed, and scaled.
Webflow CMS is built for structured content. That means instead of duplicating layouts or hardcoding repeated content, you define:
You can then update content without touching the layout or design — it stays consistent, clean, and easy to maintain.
The migration begins by mapping your existing Framer content to the right Webflow CMS structure. This includes:
Collection Lists
to render the contentFor example:
Once set up, your Webflow CMS allows:
This eliminates the need for manual duplication and reduces human error in content updates.
If you have blog posts, team members, or other dynamic content in Framer, these can be exported (if possible) or copied manually into Webflow CMS. During this process:
The goal is to retain all relevant content, but present and manage it through a system that’s built for growth.
Migrating from Framer to Webflow isn’t just about visual fidelity—it’s a chance to upgrade how your website performs in search engines and how fast it loads for users.
Framer is sleek, but Webflow gives you more technical control. If SEO and performance are important to you—and they should be—Webflow provides the tools and flexibility to build a lean, search-optimized website from the ground up.
Webflow lets you define proper semantic HTML elements—<header>
, <section>
, <main>
, <article>
, <footer>
—which helps search engines understand your site’s layout and content hierarchy. This improves crawlability and indexing.
You can also manage heading structures properly (H1, H2, H3), define image alt text, and add internal linking—all without needing a plugin or extra script.
Webflow’s hosted environment is built for speed. You benefit from:
<img srcset>
)Compared to Framer, which is optimized for design flexibility, Webflow is better suited for sites where speed, stability, and SEO matter.
Webflow gives you direct access to:
Whether you’re launching a blog, a lead generation site, or a product showcase, these tools ensure your site performs well in organic search—both at launch and over time.
If your Framer site has existing traffic or rankings, URL structure needs to be preserved or properly redirected. Webflow allows:
This ensures your SEO authority transfers safely, without drops in ranking or broken links post-migration.
Ultimately, better SEO and faster load times improve user experience. Faster pages lead to lower bounce rates, longer sessions, and better conversions—all while being easier to maintain.
Framer and Webflow are fundamentally different tools—one is design-first, the other is structure- and system-first. That means not everything translates directly. But with the right strategy, nearly all issues that arise during migration can be anticipated and solved cleanly.
This section outlines the most common challenges during a Framer to Webflow migration and how they’re handled.
Challenge: Framer offers timeline-based animations and microinteractions that can be deeply embedded into the design. Webflow’s interactions system is powerful, but structured differently.
Fix:
Challenge: Framer uses absolute/fixed positioning heavily, similar to design tools like Figma. This can lead to layout rigidity and strange behavior on small screens when ported directly.
Fix:
Challenge: Framer’s CMS is limited, and content may not be organized in a scalable or reusable format.
Fix:
Challenge: Fonts and icons used in Framer might not be available natively in Webflow or may behave differently in rendering.
Fix:
Challenge: Framer doesn’t provide the same level of SEO granularity, and some details (like Open Graph data or structured markup) might be missing entirely.
Fix:
Challenge: There is no export function for layout or content that can be directly imported into Webflow.
Fix:
While these challenges are common, none of them are blockers. Each is a known issue with a proven solution—and if planned properly, the migration becomes an opportunity to upgrade the overall quality of the site.
Migrating from Framer to Webflow isn’t just a technical transition—it’s a strategic shift. If you're asking whether Webflow is the right long-term solution, this section is here to give you clarity.
The two platforms serve different types of users and project needs. If your priorities are performance, structure, scalability, and flexibility, Webflow is often the better fit.
Start by identifying what you want to achieve with the migration. Is it purely technical—like better performance and easier maintenance? Or are you also looking to refresh the site’s design, improve SEO, or reorganize content?
Once migrated, your site gains:
Unlike Framer, where components can be created freely but lack underlying structure, Webflow enforces clarity. Each section, component, and class exists in a logical system, making it easier to grow the site over time without rework.
Webflow gives you near-complete visual control while still producing clean, production-grade HTML and CSS. You’re not limited to rigid themes or fixed layouts. If you can design it, you can build it—with semantic markup, responsive behavior, and accessibility in mind.
Webflow supports cross-functional workflows in a way Framer currently does not.
Even after migrating, you’re never stuck. Webflow outputs real HTML, CSS, and JS. You can export your codebase, integrate with APIs, or customize your site however you choose. Unlike some platforms that abstract or obscure your output, Webflow keeps it transparent and transferable.
If your Framer site has hit its limits—or you're planning to grow your business and content over time—Webflow gives you the infrastructure and creative control to scale without compromise.